|
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Frequently Asked Questions: Adult
Cardiac Surgery Database Version 2.52.1 August, 2006 How to use the interactive FAQ Document: 1. To
review all clinical questions in an individual section, click on the section
title below. |
||||||||||
|
Section D:
seq# 350-550 |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
2.
To review an individual Seq# clinical question, click on the Seq# title
below. 1280 OpCAB
3090-3180 Section R. 3. CC/TM: Corrections/Clarifications to Training
Manual |
||||||||||
|
NEW |
Date |
SeqNo |
FieldName |
Definition |
||||||
|
|
|
350 |
Weight (kg) |
Indicate the weight of the patient in kilograms. |
||||||
|
|
|
360 |
Height (cm) |
Indicate the height of the patient in centimeters. |
||||||
|
|
|
370 |
RF-Smoker |
Indicate whether the patient has a history confirming any form of
tobacco use in the past (cigarettes, cigar, tobacco chew, etc.). |
||||||
|
|
7/04 |
If
a patient is a daily smoker of marijuana, would it be appropriate to code
yes to seq# 370? |
No,
the intent is to capture a history of any form of tobacco use. Marijuana is
not a tobacco product. |
|||||||
|
|
|
380 |
RF-Smoker-Current |
Indicate whether the patient is a current smoker. Patients with a use of tobacco (cigarettes,
cigar, tobacco chew etc.) within one month of surgery are considered to be
current smokers. |
||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
|
The version 2.35 definition for smoking
was use of cigarettes within one month of surgery. My understanding was that use of other
tobacco products within one month was considered a past smoker. Version 2.41 definition states that any
tobacco product use within one month is considered present use. Is this a change to the smoking definition? |
The 2.41 definition is not a change in
intent, but is now written more clearly.
The intent is to capture any tobacco use within 1 month as current
use. ( |
|||||||
|
|
12/04 |
If a patient is using nicotine patches, is this to be coded as 'yes'
for current smoker? |
No, do not code "yes" to current smoker if a patient is
using nicotine patches or nicotine gum. |
|||||||
|
|
|
390 |
RF-Family History CAD |
Indicate if the patient has/had any
direct blood relatives (parents, siblings, children) who have had any of the
following DIAGNOSED at age <55: 1. Coronary Artery Disease (angina,
previous CABG or PCI) 2. MI 3.
Sudden cardiac death without obvious cause. If the
patient is adopted, or the family history is unavailable, code
"No". |
||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
6/03 |
How
do I answer the question of family history of CAD when the patient is
adopted? |
Code
as no. |
|||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
11/03 |
In regards to family history--the definition reads yes if early
onset (<55). I am currently
reviewing a chart of a 76 yr old. Her father had first MI in his 60's and
died of MI in his 70's. Her mother
died at 84 of MI. How can that not be
classified as + family history? Those
folks probably never doctored like people do today and if they did-did they
have the technology to prove they had CAD? I would like to classify this
woman as having + family history. What
would the correct classification be? |
CAD noted prior to age 55 is a much stronger predictor than CAD that
occurs and is diagnosed later in life.
Later in life CAD is more of an indicator of lifestyle. If your patient's family's CAD was
diagnosed after age 55 do not code as "yes" to family history of
CAD. |
|||||||
|
|
|
400 |
RF-Diabetes |
Indicate whether the patient has a
history of diabetes, regardless of duration of disease or need for
anti-diabetic agents. Includes on
admission or preoperative diagnosis.
Does not include
gestational diabetes. |
||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
6/03 |
Would
I capture a patient here that had gestational diabetes |
Do
not code unless the patient continued to be treated (diet, oral, insulin)
after the gestational period. |
|||||||
|
|
9/04 |
Patient is admitted with no history of diabetes preoperatively. During the admission for an MI, glucose
levels 200-300's. Postoperative day #3, progress notes document new onset Diabetes with
a preoperative HgA1C of 8. Patient
started on insulin and discharged on insulin. Do we consider this patient to have Diabetes as a risk factor? |
We get these types of questions often in regards to many of the risk
factor fields. To code "yes"
to any of the risk factors that are collected, you need to know of the risk
factor preoperatively. In some
clinical instances this rational may not make sense, but it is the best way
to guarantee the collection of consistent data. The definition states: Indicate
whether the patient has a history of diabetes, regardless of duration of
disease or need for anti-diabetic agents.
Includes on admission or
preoperative diagnosis. Does not
include gestational diabetes. In the case that you have described, please code "no" to the
risk factor of Diabetes |
|||||||
|
|
9/04 |
The physician reports that the patient has been a "borderline
diabetic for years." Can we
capture "borderline" as a diabetic risk factor? |
What needs to be determined is if the patient is a diabetic or
not. As you know, according to our
definition the need for anti-diabetic agents is not a factor for coding
"yes" to this field, so knowing that information will not
help. Talk with your physicians and
try to determine if the patient has a history of diabetes. As far as the term borderline diabetic --
shame on that physician. That term was
done away with a long time ago. You
either are or you are not a diabetic, like you are either pregnant or not
pregnant. Borderline diabetes
describes impaired glucose tolerance, when the blood sugars are a little bit
above normal, but not near the diabetic cut-off range. If the patient is described as
"borderline", do not capture as "yes" to diabetes. |
|||||||
|
|
|
410 |
RF-Diabetes-Control |
Indicate the method of diabetic control. Code the control method patient presented
with on admission. Patients placed on
a pre-operative diabetic pathway of Insulin drip but at admission were
controlled with NONE, diet or oral method are not coded as insulin
dependent. Choices are: None = No treatment for diabetes. Diet = Diet treatment only. Oral = Oral agent treatment. Insulin = Insulin treatment (includes any combination with insulin). |
||||||
|
|
01/06 |
How would you capture the new drug
byetta as it is an injection. |
Byetta will have to be captured as
a custom field until the next specification upgrade. Will consider adding to
Seq# 410 DiabCtrl. |
|||||||
|
|
|
420 |
RF-Dyslipidemia |
Indicate if the patient has a prior
history of dyslipidemia diagnosed and/or treated by a physician. Criteria can include
documentation of: 1. Total cholesterol greater than 200
mg/dl, or 2. LDL
greater than or equal to 130 mg/dl, or 3. HDL
less than 30 mg/dl, or 4.
Admission cholesterol greater than 200 mg/dl, or 5.
Triglycerides greater than 150 mg/dl. Note:
If treatment was initiated because the LDL was >100 mg/dl (2.59 mmole/l)
in patients with known coronary artery disease, this would quantify as a
"Yes". Any pharmacological
treatment qualifies as a "Yes". |
||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
12/03 |
1. Patient has no history of
dyslipidemia but is placed on a statin
prophylactically due to a strong family history of dyslipidemia = code
"no" to seq# 420, Dyslipidemia 2. Patient has a positive
history of dyslipidemia (abnormal cholesterol levels). Patient placed on a statin resulting in a
reduction of cholesterol levels to more "normal" levels = code
"yes" to seq# 420, Dyslipidemia. 3. Patient has no history of
dyslipidemia but is placed on a statin for non- dyslipidemia reasons, i.e.,
anti-inflammatory reasons = code "no" to seq# 420, Dyslipidemia |
||||||||
|
|
|
430 |
RF-Last Creat Lvl |
Indicate the most recent creatinine level prior to surgery. A creatinine level should be collected on
all patients for consistency, even if they have no prior history. A creatinine value is a high predictor of a
patients outcome and used in the predicted risk models. |
||||||
|
|
|
440 |
RF-Renal Fail |
Indicate whether the patient has 1) a
documented history of renal failure and/or 2) a history of creatinine >
2.0. Prior renal transplant patients
are not included as pre-op renal failure unless since transplantation their creatinine has been
or currently is > 2.0. |
||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
9/03 |
Pt comes to the ER and is diagnosed with an Aortic Dissection and is
rushed to surgery. Creatinine on admission is 2.6. No previous history of
renal failure documented in the chart. Do you still count this as a history
of renal failure even though you know the increased creatinine is due to his
recent dissection? |
Yes, code as renal failure.
This patients pre-op Creatinine level meets the criteria for renal
failure for the STS. |
|||||||
|
CC/TM |
2/04 |
The intent of this field is to capture those patients with
a history of renal failure. The
Training Manual asks the question in the Data Field Intent column Is the
patient currently in renal failure
.
The statement should read, Does the patient have a history of renal
failure (past of present) as defined by the clinical criteria in the
definition. |
||||||||
|
NEW! |
Our HIM coders tell us according to
the National Kidney Foundation & CMS there are now 6 classes of Chronic
Kidney Disease based on the GFR and we need to document which our patients
fall into preoperatively. We have found the GFR to be abnormally low (15-59)
on many patients with a seemingly normal creatinine levels. Their GFR result
would put them in a Stage III or IV chronic kidney diesease designation. These patients with seemingly normal renal
function (by creatinine level)really have significant chronic renal disease/
dysfunction and are at a higher risk for postop renal failure than their
preop creatinine would indicate. Can we code yes, history of pre-op renal
failure, using the GFR, as directed by the National Kidney Foundation and
CMS? |
No, current specifications do not
include GFR as a measure of renal failure.
Specification upgrades may redefine to include GFR. |
||||||||
|
|
|
450 |
RF-Renal Fail-Dialysis |
Indicate whether the patient is
currently undergoing dialysis. |
||||||
|
|
5/04 |
|
|
Does the STS consider ultrafiltration, CVVH/CVVH-D or
CRRT as a form of dialysis? |
After contacting a number of Nephrologists,
ultrafiltration should not be coded as dialysis, but CVVH, CVVH-D and CRRT should
be coded as dialysis. |
|||||
|
|
|
460 |
RF-Hypertension |
Indicate whether the patient has a
diagnosis of hypertension, documented by one of the following: a.
Documented history of hypertension diagnosed and treated with medication,
diet and/or exercise. b.
Blood pressure >140 systolic or >90 diastolic on at least 2 occasions. c.
Currently on antihypertensive medication. |
||||||
|
|
03/06 |
|
|
Pt in ESRD and on dialysis. Doctors state pt has htn, but the pt is not
on any meds. Assume pt htn r/t volume
overload - can I code as htn based on this information? The pt was admitted as elective CABG and I
used the only 2 vs prior to surgery induction. First one in preop and second
one is the first vs on anesthesia record prior to induction. I realize that the second vs could be elevated
r/t anxiety. Can I use these 2 vs to
code as htn? |
If there are 2 pressure readings
> 140/80, then HTN can be coded along with the physicians clinical
diagnosis. It is not our position to determine the rationale without
supporting clinical evidence. The patient may have a history of HTN and no
anti-hyperrtensive meds, but may be on some non-conventional meds that also
address their HTN such as a diuretic. Given the information given, code
HTN=yes if the 2 BP readings meet definational criteria. |
|||||
|
|
|
470 |
RF-CVA |
Indicate whether the patient has a central neurologic deficit
persisting more than 72 hours. (i.e. extremity weakness or loss of motion,
loss of consciousness, loss of speech, field cuts). |
||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
6/03 |
If
a patient had a CVA several years prior to the heart surgery and has no
residual symptoms, do we code this as a CVA yes then remote? |
Code
as yes to CVA. If a patient had a
CVA in the past, regardless of their current symptoms, this history may have
a significant impact on the CT surgery outcome. Yes, code it as a remote interval. |
|||||||
|
|
|
480 |
RF-CVA-When |
Indicate when
the CVA events occurred. Those events occurring within two weeks of the
surgical procedure are considered recent, while all others are considered
remote. |
||||||
|
|
|
490 |
RF-Infect Endocard |
Indicate whether the patient has a
history of infectious endocarditis documented by one of the following: 1.
positive blood cultures 2.
vegetation on echocardiography 3.
documented history of infectious endocarditis |
||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
9/03 |
We have a lot of patients with a history of endocarditis which was
treated and required a valve replacement. These same patients are now
returning for a second cardiac surgery on a separate valve (eg: endocarditis was on Aortic valve and
patient now returns for mitral valve replacement that is not related to
endocarditis). Should I classify the patient has having a history of treated
endocarditis? |
Yes, seq# 490 = yes, seq# 500 = treated. |
|||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
11/03 |
We have many patients return with a history of endocarditis that have
required valve replacement in the past.
The documentation is inadequate to meet the STS definition of
endocarditis but the patients clearly have a history of endocarditis based on
the documentation of valve replacement due to endocarditis. I am coding these as no for a history of
endocarditis because they do not meet the criteria of the STS
definition. Is this correct? |
The Definition Task Force states that the intent is to capture
patients that have a history, either past or present, of endocarditis in this
field, not just to capture those patients that present with current
endocarditis requiring valve surgery.
Therefore, code "yes" if history of endocarditis, which
includes this admission and in the past.
For patients with a past history of endocarditis, a positive blood
culture is not necessary to code as yes.
For those patients presenting with endocarditis on admission, a
positive blood culture is necessary to code as yes. |
|||||||
|
|
8/04 |
Patient had AVR + MVR for AI and MR. Surgeon thought one excised valve
looked suspicious and sent to pathology.
The valve grew out strep. There
were no preoperative blood cultures sent.
The patient is now on Vancomycin for endocarditis. Should Infectious
Endocarditis still be answered as No? |
We get these types of questions often.
To code "yes" to any of the risk factors that are collected,
you need to know of the risk factor preoperatively. Although in some ways this does not seem to
make sense, we feel it is the most consistent way for the sake of the data as
a whole. Please code as
"no". |
|||||||
|
NEW! |
I read the FAQ 490 dated 8-04. Based on this
standard a patient who does not have documentation of infectious
endocarditis, vegetation, or positive blood cultures in preop documentation
but vegetation is objectively found intraop and documented would be answered
as "no" for inf endo. Is this correct? If so, is this negating the
STS objective of reflecting actual risk for this patient? Is acceptance of
objective intraop findings documentation that helps to truly define clinical
pt risk something the Definitions Committee would consider accepting to
accurately stratify this type of patient? |
You are correct, you do not collect
endocarditis that is not documented preoperatively. While I appreciate the associated risk of endocarditis,
this would also apply to other situations and is therefore not appropriate to
capture. |
||||||||
|
|
|
500 |
RF-Infect Endocard Type |
Indicate the
type of endocarditis the patient has. If the patient is currently being treated
for endocarditis, the disease is considered active. If no antibiotic
medication (other than prophylactic medication) is being given at the time of
surgery, then the infection is considered treated. |
||||||
|
|
|
510 |
RF-Chronic Lung Dis |
Indicate whether the patient has chronic lung disease, and the severity
level according to the following classification: No; Mild: FEV1 60% to 75% of predicted, and/or on chronic inhaled or oral
bronchodilator therapy. Moderate: FEV1 50% to 59% of predicted, and/or on chronic steroid
therapy aimed at lung disease. Severe: FEV1 <50% predicted, and/or Room Air pO2 < 60 or Room Air
pCO2 > 50. |
||||||
|
From version2.41 |
8/03 |
No
PFTs performed and yet the physicians are documenting chronic lung disease
in medical record. |
If
no PFTs are obtained, which can be common, look to the remaining Mild: ...and/or chronic inhaled or
oral bronchodilator therapy. Moderate: ...and/or chronic steroid
therapy aimed at lung disease. Severe: ...and/or room air PO2 < 60
or room air PCO2 >50. If the |
|||||||
|
|
03/06 |
If a patient does not have a diagnosis of
lung disease documented and no FEV1 was done but the PAO2 is <60 and the
PACO2 is >50 can we put yes for chronic lung disease. |
1) Yes, code Seq# 510 ChrLungD =
Severe. The criteria reads, "FEV1<50% predicted, and/or Room Air
pO2<60 or Room Air pCO2>50. So, if any one or combination of these
criterion are met, code yes. |
|||||||
|
|
|
520 |
RF-Immunosuppressive Rx |
Indicate whether the patient has used any form of immunosuppressive
therapy (i.e. systemic steroid therapy) within 30 days preceding the
operative procedure. Does not include topical applications and inhalers or
one time systemic therapy. |
||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
|
Previously, the
definition of preoperative steroids excluded the one time dose given in the
cath lab. These definitions do not
exclude those patients. Do we count a
one time dose of steroids as immunosuppressive therapy? |
One time doses of medication should not be
included. The intent is to capture patients who are using steroids for long
term or chronic ( |
|||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
|
What are the
types of immunosuppressive therapy? |
There are 4
classes of drugs considered to be immunosuppressive. They are Corticosteroids, Cytotoxic drugs,
Antimetabolites and Cyclosporine.
Corticosteroids are included only if taken systemicallynot prn asthma
meds. This group of drugs is commonly
used to treat recipients of organ transplants, and also can be used in HIV
patients. ( |
|||||||
|
From version 2.41 |
9/03 |
Can we code this field as "yes" if inhaled steroids are
used? The def: leads me to think - yes
- "Use of any form of immunosuppressive therapy (i.e. systemic steroid
therapy) within 30 days preceding the operative procedure". |
The rest of the definition reads, "...does not include topical
applications and inhalers or one time systemic therapy." Therefore, inhaled steroids should not be
captured as "yes". |
|||||||
|
|
|
530 |
RF-Periph Vasc Dis |
Indicate whether the patient has
Peripheral Vascular Disease, as indicated by claudication
either with exertion or rest; amputation for arterial insufficiency;
aorto-iliac occlusive disease reconstruction; peripheral vascular bypass
surgery, angioplasty, or stent; documented AAA, AAA repair, or stent;
positive non-invasive testing documented.
Does not include procedures such as vein stripping, carotid disease,
or procedures originating above the diaphragm. |
||||||
|
|
|
540 |
RF-Cerebrovascular Dis |
Indicate whether the patient has
Cerebro-Vascular Disease, documented by any one of the following:
Unresponsive coma > 24 hrs; CVA (symptoms > 72 hrs after onset); RIND
(recovery within 72 hrs); TIA (recovery within 24 hrs); Non-invasive carotid
test with > 75% occlusion; or Prior carotid surgery. Does not include neurological disease
processes such as metabolic and/or anoxic ischemic encephalopathy. |
||||||
|
|
|
550 |
RF-Cerebrovascular Dis Type |
Indicate whether the patient has a
history of cerebrovascular disease, documented by any one of the following: 1.
Unresponsive Coma greater than 24 hours: Patient experienced complete mental
unresponsiveness and no evidence of psychological or physiologically
appropriate responses to stimulation. 2.
Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA): Patient has a history of stroke, i.e., loss
of neurological
function with residual symptoms at least 72 hours after onset. 3.
Reversible Ischemic Neurologic Deficit (RIND): Patient has a history of loss
of neurological function with symptoms at least 24 hours after onset but with
complete return of function within 72 hours. 4.
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA): Patient has a history of loss of
neurological function that was abrupt in onset but with complete return of
function within 24 hours. 5.
Non-invasive/invasive carotid test with greater than 75% occlusion. 6.
Previous carotid artery surgery. If more
than one, select the most recent to the operative procedure. |
||||||
|
CC/TM |
3/04 |
The Training Manual, seq# 550, Clarification Section: states code the highest or most
devastating event. This is incorrect
and the Training Manual should state, according to the definition, to select
the most recent event to the operative procedure. |
||||||||