A study of more than 100,000 patients has revealed that, for patients with blockages in multiple arteries, those who opt for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are less likely to die from their condition, less likely to need additional surgery, and less likely to have a heart attack than patients who choose to undergo a stent procedure.

Jan 18, 2023
Tomorrow at STS 2023: A study of more than 100,000 patients reveals that, for patients with blockages in multiple arteries, those who opt for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are less likely to die from their condition, less likely to need additional surgery, and less likely to have a heart attack than patients who choose to undergo a stent procedure. “The findings of our study were very convincing,” said J. Hunter Mehaffey MD, MSc, from the Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery at West Virginia University. “The singular message to the public is that the optimal treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease—to improve not only long-term survival but also lower your risk of complications—is coronary artery bypass surgery.” The results from the study, “Contemporary Artery Bypass Grafting versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in 100,000 Matched Medicare Beneficiaries,” will be presented at 9:05 a.m. PT on Sunday, January 22, during STS 2023. The background and rationale for this research project started with the publication of the 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization, Dr. Mehaffey explained. “The cardiac surgery world was really shocked, because the guidelines downgraded the indications for CABG from a class 1 recommendation to a class 2B.” “Much of this decision to downgrade was based on the guideline committee’s goals to focus on the most recent data, to ensure that they were capturing contemporary stent technology, so they only evaluated studies published within the past 5 years,” continued Dr. Mehaffey. “Therefore, these guidelines relied heavily on the recently publicized ISCHEMIA trial, which looked at medical therapy in coronary artery disease, comparing an initial invasive approach versus a conservative approach to patients who had stable coronary artery disease.” The problem that arises when using ISCHEMIA to compare CABG to stenting is that the majority of patients in the ISCHEMIA trial were not representative of patients undergoing CABG in the US. Therefore, the study didn’t fully represent the comparative benefits for patients who had multiple blockages in their coronary arteries.   Dr. Mehaffey’s team sought to conduct a large contemporary analysis that more fully represented this population, comparing patients undergoing bypass surgery with those undergoing stenting. They, too, wanted to ensure that the study included only the most contemporary technology, so their longitudinal analysis captured outcomes over a 3-year period, 2018 to 2020. “We used one of the largest and most inclusive databases of patients hospitalized in the US, including all patients over the age of 65 on Medicare,” Dr. Mehaffey explained. “We performed a very robust statistical analysis including propensity score balancing to help ensure that the groups of patients who underwent stenting versus those who underwent bypass surgery were well matched and well balanced in order to compare their outcomes.” The population included more than 100,000 patients with multivessel coronary disease, with 51,000 patients undergoing CABG and 52,000 undergoing stenting. Analysis was performed by a multidisciplinary team that included cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, and researchers at West Virginia University. The analysis demonstrated a significantly lower hospital mortality for the patients who underwent CABG compared to those who underwent stenting. Additionally, the researchers found a marked reduction in both 30-day and 3-year readmissions for myocardial infarction. CABG patients were also significantly less likely to need any additional stenting or intervention on their coronary arteries during those 3 years, and—most significantly—those who underwent CABG had a nearly 60% reduction in death at 3 years compared to those who had stenting. “Regardless of your specialty, these data demonstrate the importance of assessing longitudinal outcomes to help ensure we’re making optimal treatment recommendations for our patients,” Dr. Mehaffey said. MORE ON THIS TOPIC AT STS 2023 To fully understand the implications of the latest science--which demonstrates that CABG is superior to stenting in multivessel coronary artery disease, don't miss: C. Walton Lillehei Lecture by Peter K. Smith: "Treatment Selection for Coronary Artery Disease: The Collision of a Belief System with Evidence" Monday, 9:00 a.m. PT "The ISCHEMIA Study Does Not Reflect Patients Undergoing Coronary Surgery: An STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Analysis" by Joseph F. Sabik III, MD Monday, 11:30 a.m. PT
Jan 17, 2023
4 min read

Following rave reviews last year for the first STS Coronary Conference, the second annual event will take place June 3 – 4, 2023, in Miami, Florida. 

The 2023 conference will be an important opportunity for surgeons to learn and discuss advanced techniques with top international experts, and to connect with peers from throughout the world. With the resurgence and demonstrated benefits of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, this event will present a strong opportunity to enhance knowledge, abilities, and skills for the procedure. 

Last year’s inaugural conference attracted surgeons from 18 countries who received training on critical issues around the indications and caveats of revascularization, the multiple forms of CABG, and all aspects of perioperative therapy. STS Canadian Director Marc Ruel, MD, MPH, head of the Division of Cardiac Surgery at University of Ottawa Heart Institute, and Joseph F. Sabik III, MD, surgeon-in-chief at University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, served as last year’s course directors and will do so again in 2023. Also joining as program chairs are Sigrid Sandner, MD, director of the Coronary Revascularization Program at Vienna General Hospital, Austria; and David Glineur, MD, PhD, surgeon at University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada. 

Registration is open now at sts.org/coronaryconf.

     
Jan 3, 2023
1 min read

Recent approvals by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have made available two new technologies for treating aortic disease. The GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE) is single-branch aortic stent graft that provides an off-the-shelf solution for patients that need zone II aortic coverage and obviates the need for prior left subclavian revascularization. The Thoraflex Hybrid Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) device is a pre-mated surgical graft and an aortic stent graft to facilitate single-stage treatment of arch and proximal descending aortic pathologies.

Date
Duration
1 hr. 7 min.
Groundbreaking science for cardiothoracic surgeons and heart team members who want to take their coronary surgery programs from basic to advanced
Event dates
Jun 3–4, 2023
Location
Miami, Florida
STS News, Fall 2022 — With nearly as many women as men presenting with signs of ischemia in today’s health care settings, clinicians should keep in mind that coronary artery disease (CAD) goes beyond vessel obstruction, especially in female patients—and should take advantage of tools like advanced imaging to see past anatomic walls. “More and more, I think we're recognizing that, when they’re designed for the identification of primarily obstructive CAD, conventional approaches can lead to repeated testing, especially in women,” said Viviany R. Taqueti, MD, MPH, from Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. “And yet, often without differentiating who’s truly at risk.” Obstructive CAD is just one phenotype of ischemic heart disease, and perhaps just the tip of the iceberg when physicians take into consideration the entirety of coronary circulation, Dr. Taqueti said. A physician needs to spot other pathologies such as diffuse non-obstructive CAD and coronary microvascular dysfunction, which can certainly impact patients’ cardiovascular outcomes, she explained. As an example, Dr. Taqueti referred to a study in Denmark that presented observational data from a large registry of more than 11,000 patients who were referred for coronary angiography. The investigators found that up to a 32% of the male patients—and a startling 65% of female patients—had no significant obstructive disease to explain their symptoms. “We need a more sophisticated toolbox that looks beyond regional wall motion abnormality or even regional perfusion abnormalities to consider and quantify absolute blood flow in the heart and quantify coronary flow reserve, or CFR,” said Dr. Taqueti. Coronary microcirculation is of course too small to be directly imaged in vivo, and it needs to be evaluated indirectly by perturbing function. A variety of technologies make this possible. Coronary microvasculature, especially in female patients, represents the future of prognosis after procedures like CABG, say experts. "Conventional approaches can lead to repeated testing, especially in women. And yet, often without differentiating who’s truly at risk.” Viviany R. Taqueti, MD, MPH In the invasive realm, historically, catheter-guided wire-based testing has provided measurements of CFR and microcirculatory resistance. But noninvasive methods, including cardiac magnetic resonance, Doppler ultrasound, and—the current gold standard—positron emission tomography, are revealing just how prevalent coronary microvascular dysfunction is in patients with angina or signs of ischemia. Data from more angiography studies demonstrated that just under half of the patients had no obstructive disease. “And these were evaluated quite objectively, using fractional flow reserve normal values above 0.8,” Dr. Taqueti explained. But from that group, a large majority—76% to 89%—had some evidence of objective coronary vasomotor dysfunction on testing. “The vast majority of these had coronary microvascular dysfunction, with a minority having pure vasospasm,” said Dr. Taqueti. “This is important because we know that impaired flow reserves—that can certainly be manifestations of coronary microvascular disease—are associated with worse outcomes in terms of cardiac mortality in our patients.” More revelations come with observational data that span multiple research centers: Even in patients with no obvious obstructive lesions or inducible ischemia on stress testing, impaired CFR is independently associated with major adverse events.  In those with significant obstructive CAD, CFR also modifies the outcome of coronary revascularization procedures, especially coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), Dr. Taqueti pointed out. With long-term cardiovascular outcomes, patients with a severely reduced CFR who underwent CABG did as well as those with a preserved CFR to begin with (adjusted p for interaction = 0.03), suggesting that impaired CFR may serve as a marker for CABG benefit akin to diabetes or SYNTAX score, said Dr. Taqueti.     When severely impaired, coronary flow reserve is even more prognostically significant in women—and may be as useful of a marker for CABG benefit as diabetes or SYNTAX score. In women, severely impaired CFR appears to be even more prognostically significant. “You can see the divergence of the hazard for men and women with a significant interaction for sex as CFR values fall substantially below 2,” Dr. Taqueti explained. “Women appear to fare even worse at the very low range of CFR despite the fact that, when you look at anatomic findings, they are much less likely to have multivessel obstructive disease. In contrast, men were much more likely to have impaired CFR in the presence of multivessel disease—perhaps explaining their impaired flow reserves.” Dr. Taqueti encouraged physicians to consider how these factors reframe their approach to understanding CAD, and to emphasize appropriate diagnostic testing to identify risk, which can help to curb repeated conventional testing in patients at low risk. These recommendations were presented as part of the STS Coronary Conference this summer, in a session devoted to noninvasive diagnostic techniques for evaluation of high-risk ischemic heart disease. The conference united faculty and attendees from 18 countries with a multidisciplinary approach. Course director Marc Ruel, MD, MPH, who serves as STS Canadian Director, touted the camaraderie displayed by participants of all backgrounds. “Surgeons have to be the top experts at understanding the very reason why they operate—or not—on a patient,” Dr. Ruel said. “It comes down to much more than ‘I can do this,’; rather, it should be ‘It is a good idea to be doing this for the patient, and I have the skills to do it.’ The Coronary Conference aimed to achieve this: Expert knowledge and skills in the huge, knowledge-intensive area of coronary surgery.” Strong surgeons need strong cardiologists, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and other experts, Dr. Ruel said. “This is why we made the Coronary Conference so multidisciplinary and team-based, with a focus both on advanced practical knowledge and on advanced technical skills.” “We need to understand microvascular disease in order to better treat ischemia in both women and men,” Dr. Taqueti added. “Coronary microvasculature represents an exciting new frontier in cardiovascular disease reduction, and the future is pointing toward a role for coronary microcirculation in macrovessel disease prognosis. That’s something we need to think about in all our practices.”
Sep 30, 2022
5 min read
An expert panel highlights a team-based approach to managing cardiac surgery patients who suffer sudden postoperative cardiac arrest.
Date
1 hr.
An expert panel discusses the necessary components of building a successful robotic mitral valve repair program.
Date
Duration
1 hr. 12 min.
Several coauthors of the STS/AATS Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Type B Aortic Dissection discuss the key takeaways from this comprehensive, up-to-date summary of the state of the evidence.
Date
Duration
1 hr.

Although bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement (bio-SAVR) is generally well-tolerated, patients are thought to be at increased risk of thromboembolism for up to 90 days following bio-SAVR, supporting the current guidelines recommending the use of an anticoagulation regimen for at least the first 3 months following bio-SAVR.  This video reviews the current guidelines, literature, and controversy regarding the topic of anticoagulation in bio-SAVR patients. 

Duration
8 min.
Event dates
Apr 21–22, 2022
Location
Intuitive Surgical Robotics — Atlanta, Georgia