Diversity in the physician workforce is a key component of delivering the best care to our increasingly heterogeneous patient population. The experience of Asians in cardiothoracic surgery is not well known. With a paucity of published evidence, the webinar panel will introduce the topic through the lived experience of Asians in the specialty. The discussion will explore: 

Date
Duration
1 hr.
Dr. Molena shares how her medical journey brought her to the United States—which required repeating much of her European training—and the importance of finding a community of supporters at each step.
1 hr. 15 min.

Data analyses demonstrate that new downgraded recommendations for coronary artery bypass grafting—largely based on the ISCHEMIA trial—may result in undertreatment and complications for patients with multiple blockages

Jan 23, 2023

STS Distinguished Service Award recognizes those who advance the Society and specialty

 

Jan 23, 2023

Washington, DC surgeon will emphasize long-term outcomes and value of surgery

 

SAN DIEGO (January 23, 2023) – Cardiothoracic surgeon Thomas E. MacGillivray, MD, from MedStar Health, was elected President of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons at STS 2023 during the Society’s Business Meeting.

Jan 23, 2023
The J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Papers and the inaugural James S. Tweddell Memorial Paper in Congenital Heart Surgery were named yesterday morning at STS 2023. “Creation of a Novel Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Congenital Heart Surgery Mortality Risk Model" Jennifer Nelson, MD, MSc Nemours Children’s Health, Florida “Racial Disparities in Waitlist Outcomes of Patients Listed for Lung Transplantation” Isabella Florissi Johns Hopkins University "The COVID-19 Pandemic is Associated with Increased Cardiac Surgery Mortality, FTR, and Cost across All Socioeconomic Statuses” Raymond Strobel, MD University of Virginia “Contemporary Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in 100,000 Matched Medicare Beneficiaries” J. Hunter Mehaffey, MD, MSc West Virginia University
Jan 22, 2023
1 min read
  An all-star panel oversaw the presentation and discussion of state-of-the-art techniques in "Robotic Cardiac Surgery Is Here to Stay."     Yesterday morning, STS Members' outstanding research and achievements were recognized with these prestigious awards: The Earl Bakken Scientific Achievement Award was established in 1999 through a grant from Medtronic, Inc., to honor individuals who have made outstanding scientific contributions that have enhanced the practice of cardiothoracic surgery and patients’ quality of life. The award was named for Medtronic co-founder Earl Bakken. Among numerous other achievements, Bakken developed the first wearable artificial pacemaker. 2023 Winner:  Bartley P. Griffith, MD University of Maryland School of Medicine Selected by the STS President, this award recognizes an outstanding scientific abstract by a lead author who is either a resident or a surgeon 5 years or less in practice. 2023 Winner:  Elizabeth H. Stephens, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic The Benson R. Wilcox Resident Award, offered by the Thoracic Surgery Directors Association, recognizes an exceptional scientific abstract presented by a cardiothoracic surgery resident. 2023 Winner:  Andrea L. Axtell, MD, MPH Massachusetts General Hospital   In his President's Address, "Three Score and More," Dr. John Calhoon related the decades of experience that shaped his values as a teacher and a learner, and on the importance of employing data to improve patient care and outcomes.     Hands-on experiences brought colleagues together for invaluable advice from veteran surgeons, demonstrations of new devices and techniques, and the thrill of working as a team.   After their last competitive round was stymied by hurricane conditions in Florida, the finalists for the CT Surgery Residents Showdown finally squared off for the last time yesterday at STS 2023.  
Jan 22, 2023
2 min read

STS award honors game-changers in cardiothoracic surgery research

Jan 22, 2023
STS 2023, SAN DIEGO—Frailty in patients has existed as a nebulous marker of a patient’s physiological ability to tolerate surgery, but a simple visual assessment at the bedside is not reliable. Surgeons at STS 2023 urged others to go beyond the “eyeball” test. This issue is taking on increased importance as our large, Baby Boomer population and older patients reach a point when they may have severe disease and need cardiothoracic surgery. Physicians have long believed that a measurement of frailty is useful, but agreement remains elusive on how to best measure it. Armir Kiankhooy, MD, from Adventist Health in St. Helena, California, added that physicians’ implicit biases about age, obesity, and other characteristics may creep into and skew quick visual assessments, when in fact the assessment may be inaccurate. For instance, a higher level of frailty has been found in young adults than previously suspected, and frailty permeates all age groups.  Indicators of frailty can include malnutrition, cognitive and speech impairment, ambulatory ability, sarcopenia, and others. “If you are not doing some kind of assessment for your patients in frailty or other vulnerabilities, you are probably only seeing half the risk in your patients,” said Rakesh Arora, MD, from University Hospitals in Cleveland, Ohio. “We need a more comprehensive plan. We need to know how quickly they will bounce back from the stress of surgery.” Tools to assess frailty are increasing, and Dr. Arora recommended the Clinical Frailty Scale, a comprehensive assessment of 70 variables, but acknowledged that it may be too time- consuming for institutions with more limited resources. Instead, he advised that clinicians assess the frailty factors that are more manageable. These can include gait speed, chair rises, balance tests, and grip strength assessment for physical abilities, and potentially a Mini-COG test for memory loss and other indicators of cognition. “If you do the chair rise test, some basic cognitive assessment, a baseline hemoglobin, and a baseline serum, that probably is just as good as a more comprehensive test,” Dr. Arora said. All is not lost for patients with suboptimal frailty scores to undergo surgery. “Pre-habilitation” can help them improve their health through targeted exercise, nutrition and assistance with psychosocial issues and better prepare them for the OR.
Jan 21, 2023
2 min read
STS 2023, SAN DIEGO – “Quality people, consistency, communication, and collaboration” were declared the winning combination in the debate “For the Post-operative Patient in the ICU, Who Is in Charge and Who Is the Consultant? Surgeon or Intensivist?” on Day 1 of STS 2023. Over the last two decades, changing reimbursements, time demands on surgeons, and hiring practices have pushed surgeons and intensivists together for post-surgical care of patients—not always with the best results. Today, with a host of different circumstances at different institutions, significant variations in post-operative critical care exist across the country. Moderator Joseph Zwischenberger, MD, a cardiothoracic surgeon at University of Kentucky HealthCare in Lexington, stood ready to blow his harmonica in case tempers flared. While there were distinct differences of opinion, Andrea J. Carpenter, MD, PhD, a cardiothoracic surgeon and Assistant Dean for Health System Science at University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio (UTHSC) and Martin Zammert, MD, a surgical critical care physician who heads the cardiothoracic unit at Lahey Hospital & Medical Center in Burlington, Massachusetts, also highlighted the vital need for true surgeon-intensivist partnership. “The surgeon knows the patient’s anatomy, physiology, and social issues best,” Dr. Carpenter said. “It is the surgeon who takes responsibility and criticism for poor outcomes. So in those cases where there is not clear agreement on what the next best step is, the ultimate decision needs to be made by the surgeon.” A clear answer to the question posed did not emerge from the research both experts presented on length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and readmission rates. They turned to their real-life experiences to make their cases about the best direction and who should have ultimate authority in the ICU—where patient status can change rapidly and quick decisions need to be made about everything from mechanical ventilator support to choice of statins and vasopressors to care withdrawal. Dr. Zammert had another perspective. “Bad outcomes in the ICU are mainly non-surgical, so I don’t think the question should be ‘Who is in charge?’ I think the question we should ask ourselves is, what kind of intensivists do we want in our units?” Both agreed that cardiac critical care is distinct from other intensive care, and that intensivists need training in identifying and avoiding the postoperative complications that commonly occur following cardiac surgery. Intensivists need specific proficiencies in cardiac intensive care, and surgeons need to understand ICU post-operative care in order to foster mutual trust and respect. Dr. Zammert added that understanding how each type of specialist thinks and reasons, and keeping each other informed, create a foundation for a good relationship. “We are here to be a partner with you, not an opponent,” Dr. Zammert added. “This should never be an arranged marriage.” Along with audience members, both discussants advocated for structured rotations and experiential cross-learning for both specialties in the ICU and the OR. Dr. Carpenter, who is also Residency Program Director of Integrated Thoracic Surgery at UTHSC’s Long School of Medicine, noted that in this effort nationwide, “some programs are doing it better than others.”
Jan 21, 2023
3 min read